Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Seeing Blind Spots

For a little over a year now, I feel like the scales have gradually been falling away from my eyes, revealing particular injustices around me. Not that I've had any illusions that the world is fair, or that injustice happens on the grand scale, but that I'd failed to see its systematic presence in my own little sphere, in my community.

I grew up with certain narratives that explained how the world works. I initially thought adolescence was the classic stage for testing those narratives to determine their truth. But instead, I found adolescence was only the beginning of figuring out who I am. Adulthood seems to be the actual, lifelong stage for figuring out this crazy, complicated world.

Evidenced by the fact that I'm still overturning my own preconceptions in my late 30's - and now realize it won't be the last time I have to change my mind about something important, trading my assumptions for the truth (part of what the church calls "sanctification").

I think of these moments as tectonic shifts, mental earthquakes, because at first I resist the change. God has to present the same "new" idea to me from many angles and sources until I finally dive in to research it more fully (usually a 6-9 month process that requires an open mind and primary sources from each perspective -- not one source telling me what all the others say). When eventually the evidence tilts overwhelmingly in one direction...and I've had time to process it...I'll start to make the mental leap. It is scary and exciting, and followed by after-shocks as I discover all the ripple effects of the new-to-me landscape. Over time (years), this new aspect of my worldview settles in, even as it continues to be refined and incorporated. Ultimately, it is always liberating, because I land on far safer/stronger ground than I began (John 8:32).

This process seems particularly important for those of us who grew up as an American protestant in the late 20th century. Folks like James Dobson, John MacArthur, and the Christian Coalition appeared to assemble a long list of beliefs about the world that constituted what it meant to be a true Christian. Compared to the creeds of past generations which could be stated in a few lines (the Nicene Creed or Apostles Creed - even the Westminster Confession is relatively short), this list was extensive, including support for the death penalty, opposition to gun control, support for states' rights, criticism of welfare, glorification of the American dream, anti-affirmative action, disbelief in global warming, and enumerating exactly how the world began (ala Ken Ham) and will end (Left Behind). It was the Republican party platform of the 1980s-1990s plus some.

Which is not to say they were wrong about everything - just that they were certain about far too much. Where the Bible offers so much room for mystery and paradox and disagreement, this worldview I absorbed was black. and. white. I arrived at college honestly trying to find a democrat who was a Christian so I could figure out how those two identities could possibly fit together (which to be clear, seems absurd to me now).  

In hindsight, it is not surprising that this certainty about everything (modernism) gave birth to a generation that was uncertain about everything (post-modernism). Once you discover that one plank in your platform is not the whole truth, you wind up doubting all the planks.

And that brings us back to my own little walk of faith and all its earthquakes. Adulthood has been a process of testing plank after plank against special and general revelation (again, sanctification), confirming some, discarding others. I've alluded to a few of them briefly on this blog, from confirming the logic of Christianity to realizing the world is not getting worse to embracing the scientific community and confirming again and again that the Bible is trustworthy...

...To this year, discovering the pride and injustice in my own heart. This latest journey began when I read Americanah by Chimamanda Adichie over a year ago. Adichie's winsome novel was like a trojan horse, attacking my latent preconceptions unawares. Her two main characters are an educated Nigerian woman and man who immigrate to the US and UK (respectively) and then return to Nigeria. These international transitions allow us to "experience" (vicariously) how race, ethnicity, and culture impact the main characters and how their views of both countries shift over time. Their experiences were eye-opening for me. They brought to light errors in "conventional wisdom" that I hadn't really examined, but which have since been pummeled by many articles like this one, statistics, this podcast, a friend's perspective, and most recently the discussion around Ferguson, MO, including:

How could I have thought that racism had been overcome? Or that the struggles facing modern African Americans were not the result of centuries of the worst kind of oppression and abuse? How did I not see the evil of stereotypes -- or the evil of the pride that takes credit for privilege?

It seems so obvious to me now that I have not earned the benefit of the doubt when I interact with strangers so much as I have been given it by my lucky demographics. I haven't earned my financial security so much as I was graced with a generous environment that cultivated that security. The list goes on - probably even further than I have yet discovered.

And that, really, is the point. Being willing to discover. To re-examine assumptions, to consider other viewpoints, to change my mind. Because the only thing scarier than replacing old assumptions with the truth is never examining the old assumptions at all.

3 comments:

  1. Josh, I commend you. Few can embark on the journey that you have begun. The pursuit of truth is a journey of beauty as we discover answers to questions that we never thought to ask. I came from a similar background and viewpoint, and it took me far too long to learn to ask questions.

    Can a fish know that it is wet? You have leapt out of the ocean and seen things from a new perspective, even if you had to plunge back in. I hope that 10 years from now I do not believe the same things as I do today, but that I have learned more from new questions I have not asked.

    Keep leaping out of the ocean and continue to ask questions. It takes courage, but keep challenging your assumptions, even the scary ones. Continue to seek new viewpoints, the world is a big place. I promise to do the same. Someday we may fly, or at least walk on the beach.

    If you do not mind, I have a few questions for some of the posts that you linked to. They are not intended to debate or to say that you are wrong. Hopefully, they are helpful to you on your journey. So feel free to ignore them or reflect on them.

    Best of luck,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment! I should have clarified that I (Carolyn) actually wrote the post when I didn't realize I was signed in as Josh. Still, I look forward to reading your other comments!

      Delete
  2. Carolyn, thank you for the welcome. I hope you don’t mind that I post the comments to the other articles in this one. It seems to be a nice linking of the topics, rather than having to jump to the different posts to follow along.

    My first set of questions/comments are for your article This Blessed Life linked under “the Bible is trustworthy”. The problem of pain is an interesting challenge that CS Lewis writes about. It seems that CS Lewis approaches it as a subset of the overall problem of evil. It is interesting to ponder why bad things happen to good people, but a more challenging problem is when God orders evil/bad things to happen.

    I came across three blog articles that had a very interesting dialog on the subject.

    First is an article by Rachel Held Evans that talks about one of the less challenging examples in the Bible regarding the problem of God-directed evil/bad:
    http://rachelheldevans.com/blog/fail-abraham-test

    I came across this interesting Calvinist response:
    https://growrag.wordpress.com/2014/10/19/farewell-rachel-held-evans/

    I found this article very interesting because it illustrates the fear many of us have in asking questions. For example, in your Origins post linked under “embracing the scientific community”, you mention that you were scared of writing that article for 6 months. What were you scared of? Were you scared that friends and family would no longer consider you a Christian?

    One thing I realized as a holdover from my upbringing is that I had this principle, “Anyone who is more conservative than me is a fundamentalist, and anyone who is more liberal than me is not a Christian.” Even as I moved up/down the conservative/liberal scale, it held true. Since we came from similar backgrounds, do you find that you hold that view, too?

    As you continue on your journey, I would encourage you to question yourself if you still hold that view. Others may judge you when they see you moving on that “liberal” scale as you question race relations, creationism, etc. but I realized that I was as judgmental as the rest and it took me a long time to overcome it.

    And here was another article that commented on the dialog between the two. I link to it because it offers a very interesting viewpoint that I had never been exposed to before, the Jewish view of Abraham’s test. You wrote that you were enriched by other viewpoints, and I agree. Have you explored many of the different Jewish views of their history and faith?

    http://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2014/10/talking-back-to-god.html

    I do have more questions on some of your other articles, but I will save them for another time.

    Take care,

    ReplyDelete

Adventures in a Pandemic

Our area shut down one year ago, and it's best I didn't know how long it would last. Friends from Kansas were visiting and heard the...